• Notebooks
    • News
    • Blog
  • Contact

Danny Bellini

  • Notebooks
    • News
    • Blog
  • Contact
  • Menu

Sex vs Violence in Advertising

February 21, 2017

This is a question of which is more powerful - sex or violence?

By no means am I suggesting one over the other, but I’ve recently noticed a violent trend emerge in advertising that’s had me missing the superfluous underdressed models we’ve become accustomed to.

The ad I saw was for Texting and Driving. A woman’s hand fell across the page, lifeless. Only a dapple of blood ran down her fingers to reveal the engagement ring she proudly wore.

The ad had stopped me. So it worked.

I read the copy and I associated feelings of disgust and despair with texting and driving. Granted, I don’t own a car anymore, but when cellphones began to emerge as an extra limb, you bet damn sure I was right alongside everyone else - fighting the urge to text my girlfriend back before pulling into the black hole of tending bar.

We all know texting and driving is bad. Why do we need more blood?

Because violence will make you stop. Even staged violence.

Danger is real and we need to be reminded of that every day - like a teenager who wants to explore every drug-induced high available. An ad with a bit of blood, or a shocked expression, or an in-depth view of a battlefield pulls out the most basic of instincts – survival.

When viewing the Texting and Driving Ad I thought about my own survival; how important it is to avoid violence; that I should be listening to the ad if I ever want to join that engagement ring with a wedding band. Violence will make us stop and then we collide with the ad - like the inevitable collision of a deer and headlights.

We harken back to Aristotle’s theory of the cave wall shadows, only now our cave walls are billboards or subway slabs. The shadows are our models and priced goods. As consumers we survive in those few moments we have between each ad - only knowing the world they choose to present to us. 

Decades ago an image like the one I described above would have consumers in a state of fight or flight. Seeing so much blood and feeling that devastation... It’s like Jesus Christ on the cross. It beckons you to find sympathy immediately. Perhaps that’s the ad’s ultimate goal – to instill a visceral reaction.

But the truth is that we’re numb to those old tricks.

Yeah, I’ll stop and look at the ad, but I’m not going to fight it, or fly away from it. The only goal left is for me to remember it. The average viewer will grace a billboard for less than a second before moving on. It’s not the initial reaction these ads are working toward - it’s the lasting effect. It’s the memory. Just look at me, I remember seeing the ad months ago and yet today it's clear as glass.

I remember the ad about Texting and Driving. I remember the violence.

But what happens when we see sex? Is pro-creation not just as basic of an instinct?

Doe it measure up to survival?

Our 21st century culture has found an immeasurable amount of ways to avoid the pro-creation problem - condoms, birth control, surgery and Saturday matinees at the movie theater are all reasons why our desire to pro-create has been dulled to accommodate only instant arousal.

We don’t care about having a child, or getting married anymore. We care about sex.

We don’t want, or expect to find, true love on our way to work. We want sex. We want it now and we don’t want to have to work to get it. Our moments of desire tally a million in a day’s work. Sexual desire, I’d imagine, is more than half that. What I’m saying, and what we all know, is not a new idea. Neither is the path to exploiting it.

Half-naked women are the American dream. Making a profit off your own objectively beautiful figure is a natural aspiration to have. Turning your face and body into an object of sale for items made to beautify what should already be considered beautiful is… American?  

So what’s happening when I look at an ad for Victoria’s Secret? I’m not looking at the words, nor the product, or even the store it’s sitting above. I’m recognizing my desire for instant gratification and I’m working to extinguish it before embarrassing myself in public. I’m looking at long legs, a tight ass, pushed up breasts and a foreign facial structure; and I’m forgetting these are real people. I’m looking at what they’ve sold to me as perfection and I’m forgetting that it’s probably been photoshopped. I’m bombarded with my immediate attraction then suddenly stifled by my sense of proper etiquette in public. Suffocating my arousal with chivalrous hindsight.

It’s maddening to feel so encumbered by your own instinct.

It makes you walk faster, step harder, think further ahead - it makes you remember how embarrassing it was to be aroused on a city sidewalk.

The risqué is attractive. The risk is memorable.

It’s what keeps terrible people doing terrible things. It’s arousing to think your arousal is somehow wrong - and that is what it’s all banking on. The hidden joy behind being naughty. There is no hidden joy in violence, unless you’re Jeffery Dahmer and you needed violence to bring your new friend into a state submission. There shouldn’t be a joy in violent actions.

Violence, conservatively, does not bring about a state of joy for most people. This is why Sex wins over Violence in advertising. It is more common to have wildly suppressed sexual desires than violent ones. Our repression extrapolates our ability to remember what ignites our desires. It’s like when you try to hold your orgasm in during sex. You say to yourself, don’t do it, don’t do it, but we all know that only makes you do it faster. You know this and yet you can’t help doing it. It’s a loop that lingerie ads feed into every day.

So the winner, I think, for a more powerful marketing tool is Sex.

Obviously I’m not the first to think this way but I’m also not objectively thinking. If you happened to make it through this whole post and you disagree with any of my points or just want to argue for the sake of arguing please comment below.

These are just my ramblings of a thought process curated over years of living both on and behind the polysemous camera. Another good question would be about our obsession with violence in American entertainment - if it is inhibiting us to feel joy in its presence the more we’re surrounded by it.

← Why Did I Watch the Oscars?How to Avoid Discussing Politics at Work →
  • September 2024 3
    • Sep 25, 2024 What I Learned Being a Feature Film Screener for a Popular Film Festival Sep 25, 2024
    • Sep 13, 2024 Continuing Education at SVA Sep 13, 2024
    • Sep 8, 2024 Spreading The Word with Narcan® Nasal Spray Sep 8, 2024
  • May 2020 1
    • May 5, 2020 How I made a TV Show intro into a Political Statement May 5, 2020
  • April 2020 1
    • Apr 16, 2020 Creativity in the Time of Corona Apr 16, 2020
  • November 2019 1
    • Nov 5, 2019 Developing a Personal Logo Nov 5, 2019
  • September 2019 1
    • Sep 25, 2019 How Colors Define a Logo Sep 25, 2019
  • March 2018 1
    • Mar 26, 2018 The Art of Framing: Theories on Left and Right in Hitchcock’s Vertigo Mar 26, 2018
  • August 2017 1
    • Aug 9, 2017 Narrowing Thought - All the Ways in Which We're Living in Orwell's 1984 Aug 9, 2017
  • March 2017 2
    • Mar 16, 2017 Hello Fresh, Hello Reality Mar 16, 2017
    • Mar 9, 2017 How to Stay Sober in a Trump America Mar 9, 2017
  • February 2017 4
    • Feb 28, 2017 Why Did I Watch the Oscars? Feb 28, 2017
    • Feb 21, 2017 Sex vs Violence in Advertising Feb 21, 2017
    • Feb 14, 2017 How to Avoid Discussing Politics at Work Feb 14, 2017
    • Feb 7, 2017 The Mondays Feb 7, 2017
  • January 2017 5
    • Jan 31, 2017 Are we dating our Ads? Jan 31, 2017
    • Jan 24, 2017 Why it's Good to Wake up Early for Work Jan 24, 2017
    • Jan 17, 2017 When to be a YES Man Jan 17, 2017
    • Jan 13, 2017 How to Calm Down Before Work Jan 13, 2017
    • Jan 12, 2017 How to Creatively turn your Failure into a Success. Jan 12, 2017